tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11993496.post9197441975377846200..comments2007-08-26T22:49:44.255-05:00Harlanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16421476381201312593noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11993496.post-53395300167000078342007-08-26T22:49:00.000-05:002007-08-26T22:49:00.000-05:00Best part of the Schmuck case?<BR/><BR/>Petitioner was a USED-CAR SALESMAN.<BR/><BR/>Other than that, it's pretty routine for descriptions of property to be named as a party in a seizure case.<BR/><BR/>Not nearly as much fun as you make it out to be - unless it's real property that's being seized, in which case you sometimes see the legal description, which can be entertaining just in its sheer pomposity.Brandeishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18043542405007568567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11993496.post-1701870201553274952007-08-24T18:05:00.000-05:002007-08-24T18:05:00.000-05:00I think I may have found your third place winner: <A HREF="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=489&invol=705" REL="nofollow"><BR/>Schmuck v. United States</A><BR/><BR/>Also, speaking of 50 Cent and the Supreme Court: <A HREF="http://www.hiphopmusic.com/archives/001211.html" REL="nofollow"><BR/>50 Cent Positioning Himself for Supreme Court Nomination</A>Miss Bhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16075772355885963306noreply@blogger.com