tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11993496.post8166901652361814604..comments2008-06-21T18:18:54.654-05:00Harlanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16421476381201312593noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11993496.post-51585850689497848352008-06-18T14:06:00.000-05:002008-06-18T14:06:00.000-05:00In any event, it's a despicable joke, and you're going to Hell for telling it.<BR/><BR/>Hugs!Brandeishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18043542405007568567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11993496.post-69475840118330585852008-06-18T13:51:00.000-05:002008-06-18T13:51:00.000-05:00Sorry Brother Brandeis, but the joke doesn't really work the other way around.Harlanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16421476381201312593noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11993496.post-12878321589901314962008-06-18T13:44:00.000-05:002008-06-18T13:44:00.000-05:00Assuming your premise, yes.<BR/><BR/>But, if you had actually READ the post, Brother mine, you would know that the ownership relationship flows the other way.<BR/><BR/>Jeez.Brandeishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18043542405007568567noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11993496.post-64633496807964189072008-06-18T13:30:00.000-05:002008-06-18T13:30:00.000-05:00If Scalia owns Thomas, does that mean the more accurate vote count in <I>Boumediene</I> was 5-3.6?Harlanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16421476381201312593noreply@blogger.com