tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11993496.post6915933682869099905..comments2008-09-08T08:03:04.288-05:00Harlanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16421476381201312593noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11993496.post-63831608032401485282008-09-08T08:03:00.000-05:002008-09-08T08:03:00.000-05:00The bullet is the evidence, not the leg. Under operator101's concept, the police can seize my torso if I'm shot in the stomach. Now THAT would be a REALLY BIG "dick move." <BR/><BR/>Keith G. in P.V.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11993496.post-82126443081138903052008-09-05T18:07:00.000-05:002008-09-05T18:07:00.000-05:00If the leg was seized as evidence pursuant to the criminal investigation and if an arrest was made, the defendant has the constitutional right to require the police keep the evidence so that he may inspect and challenge the evidence at trial. How is that a 'dick move'? The cops did the right thing - seize evidence. The prosecutor is not the one with the authority to release the leg b/c it's up to the defendant to acquiesce since these are his constitutional rights that are being impacted.<BR/><BR/>The defendant is the dick here, not the prosecutor, not the cops. The victim got royally screwed over but only by the defendant.operator101http://www.operator101.comnoreply@blogger.com