tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11993496.post113348658592187035..comments2007-04-15T12:20:38.462-05:00Harlanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16421476381201312593noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11993496.post-1133893933002685972005-12-06T13:32:00.000-05:002005-12-06T13:32:00.000-05:00What? Two-thirds of that "news article" is factually true. And think about the Federalist Papers. If they were written in the style I use, maybe then I would accept the legitimacy of originalism.<BR/><BR/>By the way Brandeis, I know you will agree with me on this. In order to win the debate over constitutional ideology, we in our camp cannot accept the frame for discussion that conservatives use in the term "originalism." We have an obligation to epxose that ideal for what it really is - anachronistic constitutionalism (or perhaps just AC for short). <BR/><BR/>It is hereby the policy of Supreme Dicta that the term originalism never again appear on this site. Violators are subject to public rebuke as well a fine of $1 to the John Marshall Harlan Bahama Relief Fund.<BR/><BR/>It is so ordered,<BR/><BR/>JMH, Clerk of BlogHarlanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15898126834467439620noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11993496.post-1133500062001934692005-12-02T00:07:00.000-05:002005-12-02T00:07:00.000-05:00Tsk, tsk, Harlan - you shouldn't make fun of Nino that way. You know he has no sense of humor.Brandeishttp://www.streetprophets.comnoreply@blogger.com