The craziness quotient of the presidential election just got ratcheted up by a big factor. Guess who's back on the scene?
Go check out his site. It's like 1992 all over again with the charts and the graphs. We just need another Texas wedding to be sabotaged and it's freackin' deja vu. And once again, Perot is talented when it comes to outlining problems, but totally lacking in good solutions.
BTW, I think the Perot audience is getting very old. Check out on the entries on the FAQs page:
FAQ 1: Is PerotCharts.com a Web site or is it a blog? And what is a blog?
PerotCharts.com is a Web site with a blog, but the emphasis of this Web site is placed on the blog. For those visitors who are not yet acquainted with blogs, here is a brief explanation, along with some history of the word blog.
A few years ago, traditional Web site developers realized that with a few changes to their software, they could make the job of updating a Web site much easier for non-technical people who were usually more interested in what their Web sites had to say, rather than how they looked. This group was primarily composed of would-be journalists searching for an alternative means of publishing their thoughts and ideas quickly and often, as well as individuals simply wanting to maintain online diaries.
On a somewhat serious note, I was a research assistant on a book about the Perot movement and its impact on the other two political parties. Go check it out (I even get a mention in the acknowledgments).
dicta \ 'dik-te \ n. [L. fr. neut. of dictus, ptp. of dicere] (1599) 1: a noteworthy statement: as a: a formal pronouncement of a principle, proposition, or opinion b: an observation intended or regarded as authoritative 2: a judicial opinion on a point other than the precise issue involved in determining a case 3: a legendary coach of the Chicago Bears football team from 1982-1992. 



0 comments:
Post a Comment